The Baroness of Disgust

I'll admit that I'm no Constitutional scholar but I'm an expert compared to three out of the four cretins who testified yesterday (Dec. 4th) at the impeachment hearings fraud.where important national security and other matters are being totally ignored to try to impeach President Donald Trump. What is so scary is that, with the exception of Jonathan Turley, law professor at George Washington University the other three were typical left-wing loons who can't see the truth through their bias and hate for President Donald Trump. And just like Anita Hill 30 or so years ago who seemed to come out of nowhere trying to keep Savannah's own jurist, Clarence Thomas off the Supreme Court bench...fortunately it didn't work but it sure was messy. But from our "A Leopard Doesn't Change His Spots" department the Dems are up to their same old tricks. Did you ever wonder where all those women who suddenly popped up accusing black conservative Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain of all sorts of sexual misconduct went once he dropped out of the race? He was accused by these women, whom he said he'd never even met, of some pretty criminal stuff if you're a Republican--if you're a Democrat it doesn't matter a single bit! They just seem to evaporate like mist...gone, never to be heard from again. They accomplished their purpose without ever once being accused of being racist--the left could not afford to have a conservative black man as shatters their entire argument. A successful black businessman who didn't grow up on the "liberal plantation."

The respective institutions of "higher learning" should be extremely embarrassed after yesterday's performance by the three besides the aforementioned Turley. Professors Michael Gerhardt, Noah Feldman and Pamela Karlan. While listening to these highly-biased Democrat voters and Hillary contributors I was wondering if they have ever even read the Constitution much less be an "expert" on it. They continually made up stuff or repeated the lie from Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler and their confederates that President Trump stiff-armed the president of the Ukraine on a quid-pro-quo unless their was an investigation of Joe Biden. We've already heard the transcript of the phone call and there was no such demand. The president of the Ukraine has insisted ad nauseum that there was no such offer made or even implied. Two weeks ago the Dems STAR WITNESS even said there was no quid pro quo and he was speculating on anything else. Yet Ukraine got the money and the military hardware and equipment they requested, unlike the Oh-Bomb-Uh Administration which abandoned Ukraine when the Russians attacked and Barry didn't give the Uks squat! Russia annexed some of their land and we did nothing about it in violation of a treaty we had with them and the media and Congress seemed to have no trouble with that atol.

The Dems never finish the sentence when they accuse the president of asking for an investigation into Joe Biden--they keep saying Biden is the a "political opponent" and therefore President Trump was asking the Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election. There's a vulgar street term for this but I'll clean it up and just say, HOGWASH! The left has a habit of going by one of Hitler's lieutenants, Joseph Goebbles who was famous for saying, "If you repeat a lie long enough, people will begin to believe it." And Hitler's philosophy was that people will believe a big lie quicker than they'll believe a little one. It's also in Rules for Radicals. But the Dems are betting on the gullibility of the American public and it works. They are famous or infamous depending on your political viewpoint...they never "finish the sentence." The fact that Joe Biden is now a candidate for president (God forbid!!!) is immaterial--Biden should have been investigated when he was in office as the VP. There was even a New York Times editorial warning that his Ukraine connection and his son Hunter's role wasn't passing the "smell" test. Should have been investigated then and should be investigated now.

But here come Gerhardt, Feldman, and Karlan babbled on about Trump insisting of the quid pro quo and that's impeachable. Only Jonathan Turley brought that ballon back down to earth saying, "I'm concerned about lowering impeachment standards to fit a paucity of evidence and an abundance of anger. I believe this impeachment not only fails to satisfy the standard of past impeachments, but would create a dangerous precedent for future impeachments." But of all the ridiculous remarks by the previous three the "Disgusting Award" goes to--ENVELOPE PLEASE!!!--Professor Pamela Karlan for the most despicable analogy of the day when she brought up Trumps 13-year-old son, Barron trying to equate his name with royalty and the implication was that President Trump somehow--13-years ago, almost 10 years before he was even president, gave his kid a name pronounced like "baron" which means "nobleman." Ironically, a baron is the lowest rank of nobleman. Just listen and watch her wearing glasses she looks like she borrowed from Rachael Maddow. I can remember when Bill Clinton was unfortunately president, Chelsea was strictly off limits and the press treated her like --well royalty and the same with the Obama kids. Strictly off limits, especially the Obamas because any reference to them had better be positive if you wanted to keep your job and not be accused of racism. Of course, Karlan later apologized but the damage was already done. See and hear, but don't do it too quickly after eating!

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content

WTKS · Savannah's NewsRadio 97.7FM and 1290AM
Listen Now on iHeartRadio